Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

EAS Field

XML Field

FGDC Field

AVS Field

Example

Comment

addresses.address_id int

key

na

 

 

 

address_base.base_address_prefix char(10)

base_number_prefix

address number prefix text

 

 

 

address_base.base_address_num int

base_number

address number int

AVS_ADDRESSES.STREET_NUMBER NUMBER(6)

 

 

address_base.base_address_suffix char(10)

base_number_suffix

address number suffix text

 

 

MAD-122

?

?

?

AVS_ADDRESSES.STREET_NUMBER_SFX VARCHAR2(1)

V, A, C, P

MAD-122

address_base.zone_id int

jurisdiction

community place name text

 

SFMAIN, TI, PRESIDIO

FGDC field is approx

address_base.geoemtry.longitude double

longitude

address longitude double

 

 

 

address_base.geoemtry.latitude double

latitude

address latitude double

 

 

 

address_base.street_segment.st_name char(29)

street_name

street name text

AVS_STREETS.STREET_NAME VARCHAR2(28)

 

todo - problem with field width

address_base.street_segment.st_type char(6)

street_name_suffix

street name post type text

AVS_STREET_SUFFIXES.STREET_SFX VARCHAR2(2)

 

data type mismatch is accomodated in xml

addresses.unit_num_prefix char(5)

unit_number_prefix

na

 

 

 

addresses.unit_num char(20)

unit_number

unit identifier text

AVS_ADDRESSES.UNIT NUMBER(6)

 

todo - is data type mismatch

addresses.unit_num_suffix char(10)

unit_number_suffix

na

AVS_ADDRESSES.UNIT_SFX VARCHAR2(10)

 

 

addresses.unit_type_id int

na

unit type text

na

suite, apartment

 

na

na

na

AVS_ADDRESSES.ADDRESS_TYPE VARCHAR2(10)

PRIMARY, ALTERNATE, ALIAS

 

addresses.create_tms datetime

create_tms

na

 

 

 

addresses.retire_tms datetime

retire_tms

na

AVS_ADDRESSES.END_DATE DATE

 

 

addresses.disposition_code int

disposition

address lifecycle status text

 

provisional, offical

FGDC field is approx

na

na

address official status text

AVS_ADDRESSES.VALID VARCHAR2(1)

 

EAS combines this with address life cycle status

addresses.mailable_flg boolean

mailing

na

 

 

 

parcel.block_num char(5)

block

na

AVS_STRUCTURES.BLOCK VARCHAR2(5)

 

 

parcel.lot_num char(5)

lot

na

AVS_STRUCTURES.LOT VARCHAR2(4)

 

todo - field with mismatch

parcel.blk_lot char(9)

apn

na

 

 

 

na

na

building identifer text

AVS_STRUCTURES.STRUCTURE_NUMBER VARCHAR2(2)

 

 

addresses_history.last_change_tms datetime

timestamp

na

 

 

 

addresses_history.history_action char(10)

action

na

 

 

 

addresses.unq_adds_id int

na

na

AVS_ADDRESSES.ADDRESS_KIND VARCHAR2(10)

DBI, ASSESSOR

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Example 11
Anchor
example11xml
example11xml

This version shall support the rework of the model RE MAD-156.

Code Block

<addressChangeNotification>
    <address>
        <key>419709</key>
        <base_number_prefix></base_number_prefix>
        <base_number>1</base_number>
        <base_number_suffix></base_number_suffix>
        <jurisdiction>PRESIDIO</jurisdiction>
        <longitude>-122.418876252</longitude>
        <latitude>37.774694542</latitude>
        <street_name>SOUTH VAN NESS</street_name>
        <street_name_suffix>
            <abbreviated>AVE</abbreviated>
            <unabbreviated>AVENUE</unabbreviated>
        </street_name_suffix>
        <unit_number_prefix>XXX</unit_number_prefix>
        <unit_number>300</unit_number>
        <unit_number_suffix>YYY</unit_number_suffix>
        <create_tms>2010-08-13 12:15:43.828000</create_tms>
        <retire_tms>2010-08-13 18:41:16.149255</retire_tms>
        <disposition>provisional</disposition>
        <mailing>True</mailing>
        <action>insert</action>
        <parcel_link_change>
            <block>3506</block>
            <lot>001</lot>
            <apn>3506001</apn>
            <action>insert</action>
        </parcel_link_change>
    </address>
    <timestamp>2010-08-13 18:41:16.149255</timestamp>
</addressChangeNotification>