Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

As you can see this will not support aliases. Also DPW is starting

The simplest thing that could possibly work would be...

Code Block

<base_address>
    ...
    <StreetSegment>
        <Primary>
            <street_name>MISSION BAY SOUTH</street_name>
            <street_name_suffix>
                <abbreviated>BLVD</abbreviated>
                <unabbreviated>BOULEVARD</unabbreviated>
            </street_name_suffix>
        </Primary>
        <Alias>
            <street_name>MISSION BAY SOUTH BLVD</street_name>
            <street_name_suffix>
                <abbreviated></abbreviated>
                <unabbreviated></unabbreviated>
            </street_name_suffix>
        </Alias>
        <!-- more aliases here -->
    <StreetSegment>
    ...
</base_address>

This approach accomplishes our immediate goals.
Should we do this?
I still find myself leaning towards leaving the message format as is
and changing the consumer over to use EAS IDs for the updates.

Now, the bigger picture...

DPW has already started work to add pre and post direction next week.
This would be the "SOUTH" in "MISSION BAY BLVD SOUTH".
I will be meeting Eddy at DPW tomorrow and DPW Fri Sept 16.
Of utmost importance is that our stuff does not break with the changes he makes.
What I describe below is a starting point if we are forced to make changes caused by DPW changes.

As always I will push for following the FGDC modelstandards.
For too much information on the FGDC see:
http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/FGDC-standards-projects/street-address
I have found this documemnt documment to contain about the right amount of information:
http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/FGDC-standards-projects/street-address/AddressStandardFINAL.zip

Here is a fragment for CompleteStreetName that follows the FGDC postal address standard final draft.

Code Block
<CompleteStreetName>
    <StreetNamePreModifier></StreetNamePreModifier>
    <StreetNamePreDirectional></StreetNamePreDirectional>
    <StreetNamePreType></StreetNamePreType>
    <StreetName>MISSION BAY</StreetName>
    <StreetNamePostType>BLVD</StreetNamePostType>
    <StreetNamePostDirectional>NORTH</StreetNamePostDirectional>
    <StreetNamePostModifier></StreetNamePostModifier>
</CompleteStreetName>

And here is what I think we may need for right nowthese immediate DPW changes.

Code Block
<CompleteStreetName>
    <StreetNamePreDirectional></StreetNamePreDirectional>
    <StreetName>MISSION BAY</StreetName>
    <StreetNamePostType>BLVD</StreetNamePostType>
    <StreetNamePostDirectional>NORTH</StreetNamePostDirectional>
</CompleteStreetName>

If we add aliases to the change notification ,
and we were starting from scratch I would go this routeit may look like this...

Code Block
<base_address>
    ...
    <StreetSegment>
        <StreetSegmentId>12345</StreetSegmentId>
        <StreetNames>
            <Primary>
                <CompleteStreetName>
                    <StreetNamePreDirectional></StreetNamePreDirectional>
                    <StreetName>MISSION BAY NORTH</StreetName>
                    <StreetNamePostType>BLVD</StreetNamePostType>
                    <StreetNamePostDirectional></StreetNamePostDirectional>
                </CompleteStreetName>
                <StreetNamePostTypes>
                    <abbreviated>BLVD</abbreviated>
                    <unabbreviated>BOULEVARD</unabbreviated>
                </StreetNamePostTypes>
            </Primary>
            <Alias>
                <CompleteStreetName>
                    <StreetNamePreDirectional></StreetNamePreDirectional>
                    <StreetName>MISSION BAY BLVD NORTH</StreetName>
                    <StreetNamePostType></StreetNamePostType>
                    <StreetNamePostDirectional></StreetNamePostDirectional>
                </CompleteStreetName>
                <StreetNamePostTypes>
                    <abbreviated></abbreviated>
                    <unabbreviated></unabbreviated>
                </StreetNamePostTypes>
            </Alias>
            <!-- additional aliases here -->
        </StreetNames>
    </StreetSegment>
    ...
</base_address>

This approach

  • insluates us from impending changes at DPW
  • supports alias
  • supports various suffixes
  • trys to follow the FGDC standard

However, a more concise appraoch would be...

Code Block

<base_address>
    ...
    <StreetSegment>
        <Primary>
            <street_name>MISSION BAY SOUTH</street_name>
            <street_name_suffix>
                <abbreviated>BLVD</abbreviated>
                <unabbreviated>BOULEVARD</unabbreviated>
            </street_name_suffix>
        </Primary>
        <Alias>
            <street_name>MISSION BAY SOUTH BLVD</street_name>
            <street_name_suffix>
                <abbreviated></abbreviated>
                <unabbreviated></unabbreviated>
            </street_name_suffix>
        </Alias>
    <StreetSegment>
    ...
</base_address>

This simpler approach accomplishes our immediate goals.
I'll be talking to DPW tomorrow to see if we must to make changes in EAS
to prevent breakage when they make changes StreetNamePreDirectional and StreetNamePostDirectional

...